Act on this, mostly signal

aSPARK plugin keeps spec, plan, review and QA files per feature

What to do

Try the MIT-licensed aSPARK Claude Code plugin, and add the optional aspark-guard gate for review.

Why

It logs what Claude rejected, not just what it built, and the author reports token savings.

What the research found

A Reddit author released aSPARK, an MIT-licensed Claude Code plugin keeping per-feature spec, plan, review and QA files, plus an optional aspark-guard gate; token savings are the author's own count.

Claims and how well the evidence supports them

aSPARK is a Claude Code plugin under the MIT license 98%
aspark keeps per-feature spec, plan, code review and QA files in the repo 99%
aspark-guard blocks release while a gate is red 99%

Evidence

reddit.com https://reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1xbyg3k/i_made_claude_write_down_what_it_rejected_not
github.com https://github.com/a-lottes/aSPARK

Actionability rated low.